What Does Isometric Strength Actually Tell Us?
Understanding How Changes in Strength Relate to Jumping, Sprinting, and Change-of-Direction Performance
Isometric testing has become increasingly popular in elite football.
Tests such as the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull (IMTP) and hip adduction or abduction assessments are quick to administer, highly reliable, and create minimal fatigue. For clubs operating in congested fixture schedules, they offer an attractive alternative to more demanding performance tests.
But an important question remains.
If a player’s isometric strength improves across a season, does their on-pitch physical performance improve too?
A recent study by Asimakidis and colleagues sought to answer exactly that by examining the relationships between seasonal changes in isometric strength and dynamic performance in elite academy footballers.
Stronger Players Jump Better
The clearest finding from the study was the relationship between IMTP strength and countermovement jump performance.
Players who increased their IMTP peak force across the season also tended to improve jump height, jump power, and reactive strength characteristics. The relationships were moderate to large in magnitude, suggesting that improvements in maximal force capacity were reflected in tasks requiring high levels of vertical force production.
This makes intuitive sense.
Both the IMTP and countermovement jump require athletes to generate large amounts of force through similar lower-limb muscle groups. While one test is static and the other dynamic, they share enough mechanical similarities that improvements in one appear to transfer to the other.
For practitioners, this reinforces the value of IMTP testing as a monitoring tool when the goal is to track changes in force-producing capacity that may influence jumping performance.
Strength Matters for Change of Direction
The second key finding was that stronger players became better at changing direction.
Improvements in IMTP strength were associated with faster 505 change of direction times throughout the season. This relationship was not huge, but it was consistent.
Why might this occur?
Effective change of direction performance requires athletes to rapidly decelerate, absorb force, and then re-accelerate in a new direction. These actions place substantial braking demands on the lower body.
The ability to produce and tolerate high forces is therefore likely an important component of successful change of direction performance.
This finding provides further evidence that maximal strength development remains an important physical quality for footballers, particularly for actions involving braking and re-acceleration.
Strength Does Not Automatically Improve Sprint Performance
Perhaps the most surprising finding was what the researchers did not observe.
Despite improvements in isometric strength, there were no meaningful associations with 5 m, 10 m, or 30 m sprint performance across the season.
This challenges the common belief that getting stronger automatically makes players faster.
Sprint performance is influenced by a range of factors beyond maximal force production. Technique, force orientation, coordination, stiffness, and stretch-shortening cycle efficiency all contribute to acceleration and maximal velocity running.
A player may become significantly stronger while showing little change in sprint performance if these other qualities are not simultaneously developed.
Strength training remains important, but practitioners should not assume that increases in force production alone will guarantee improvements in sprint performance.
The Unique Role of Hip Strength in Performance
One of the most novel aspects of the study was the inclusion of hip-specific strength assessments.
Interestingly, improvements in hip abduction strength were associated with better jump performance and faster change of direction ability. In contrast, hip adduction strength showed no meaningful relationships with any of the dynamic performance measures.
This suggests that hip abductors may play a more important role in tasks requiring pelvic control, frontal-plane stability, and force production during braking and directional changes.
That does not mean adductor testing lacks value.
Hip adduction strength remains highly relevant for groin injury monitoring, rehabilitation, and return-to-play decision making. However, practitioners should be cautious about expecting improvements in adductor strength to directly translate into better athletic performance.
Take Home Points
One of the biggest mistakes practitioners make is assuming that every physical quality transfers equally to every performance outcome.
This study reinforces the principle of specificity.
Increases in isometric strength were associated with improvements in jumping and change of direction performance, but not sprinting, endurance, or unilateral jump ability. Hip abduction strength appeared more relevant to dynamic performance than hip adduction strength.
The take-home message is not that isometric testing is unimportant. Quite the opposite.
IMTP and hip strength assessments remain valuable, low-fatigue tools for monitoring athletes throughout the season. However, they should be viewed as indicators of force capacity rather than direct substitutes for dynamic performance testing.
Football Performance Network
If you want to make better decisions around physical preparation, monitoring and career development, this is exactly what we work on inside the Football Performance Network.
You will be learning alongside 70+ physical performance coaches and sport scientists working in professional football, sharing ideas, solving problems, and improving your day to day practice.
The next intake opens in July 2026.